DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs payable to the appellant-respondent and respondents-appellants by the plaintiff, the motion and cross motions are granted, and the complaint, the third-party complaint, and all cross claims are dismissed.
In support of their separate motion and cross motions for summary judgment, the appellant-respondent and respondents-appellants (hereinafter the appellants) made prima facie showings of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320). In opposition to the motion and cross motions, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. In particular, the plaintiff offered nothing more than speculation that any alleged negligence on the part of the appellants was a proximate cause of the decedent's death (see Johnson v. Sniffen, 265 A.D.2d 304). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the appellants' respective motion and cross motions for summary judgment.
RITTER, J.P., SMITH, GOLDSTEIN and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.