DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a resonable doubt because it was more consistent with intentional murder than depraved indifference murder is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v. Bynum,
70 N.Y.2d 858; People v. Ferguson,
240 A.D.2d 510; People v. Fama,
212 A.D.2d 542), and, in any event, is without merit (see People v. Sanchez,
98 N.Y.2d 373; People v. Crawford,
295 A.D.2d 361; People v. Flowers,
289 A.D.2d 504; People v. Lyons,
280 A.D.2d 926; People v. Tankleff,
199 A.D.2d 550, affd
84 N.Y.2d 992; People v. Abney,
173 A.D.2d 545).
The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit.
SANTUCCI, J.P., SMITH, McGINITY and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.