Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

STACY FEINGLASS MANZO on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. RITE AID CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, MARTIN L. GRASS, TIMOTHY J. NOONAN, FRANKLIN C. BROWN, NANCY A. LIEBERMAN, LEONARD STERN, PRESTON R. TISCH, WILLIAM J. BRATTON, and KPMG LLP, Defendants Below, Appellees.

Appeal dismissed.

Unpublished opinion is below.

STACY FEINGLASS MANZO on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. RITE AID CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, MARTIN L. GRASS, TIMOTHY J. NOONAN, FRANKLIN C. BROWN, NANCY A. LIEBERMAN, LEONARD STERN, PRESTON R. TISCH, WILLIAM J. BRATTON, and KPMG LLP, Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 23, 2003. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: May 28, 2003. Decided: May 29, 2003.

ORDER

E. Norman Veasey, Chief Justice:

This 29th day of May 2003, upon consideration of the briefs of the parties, and their contentions in oral argument, it appears to the Court that the judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons set forth in its decision dated December 19, 2002.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MANZO v. RITE AID CORPORATION
(May 29, 2003)