Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BARRY KRISCHER, State Attorney and THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellants, v. MICHAEL FORD, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals a trial court order, which granted the defendant's motion to enforce the plea agreement and ordered the release of the defendant from the "care, custody and control of Florida Department of Children and Families." The defendant had been held pursuant to a probable cause finding under the Jimmy Ryce Act. We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. Satz v. Runion, 838 So.2d 689 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); State v. Stapleton, 764 So.2d 886 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1988).

For the reasons set forth in Runion, we grant the petition and quash the trial court's order. See also Murray v. Regier, 27 Fla. L. Weekly S1008 (Fla. Dec. 5, 2002); Krischer v. Faris, 838 So.2d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

We note the trial court did not have the benefit of Murray, Faris, and Runion when it ruled on the defendant's motion.

STONE, STEVENSON and MAY, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KRISCHER v. FORD
(May 28, 2003)