DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The appellants argue that the promulgation by the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (hereinafter the DHCR) of certain amendments to the Emergency Tenant Protection Regulations was in violation of several provisions of the State Administrative Procedure Act, including § 202(1)(f)(v). However, as the Supreme Court correctly found, the DHCR "substantially complied" with State Administrative Procedure Act § 202(1)(f)(v) (see Matter of Industrial Liaison Comm. of Niagara Falls Area Chamber of Commerce v. Williams, 72 N.Y.2d 137, 144). The DHCR's summary of the description of the "subject, purpose and substance" of the amendments was reasonably precise (Matter of Hospital Assn. of N.Y. State v. Axelrod, 164 A.D.2d 518, 525).
The appellants' remaining contentions are without merit.
ALTMAN, J.P., FLORIO, ADAMS and RIVERA, JJ., concur.