AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CENTEREACH REALTY, LLC, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent.

The policy issued by Essex plainly states that it does not provide coverage for injuries to employees of its named insured, Grandview Contracting Corp. Inasmuch as the underlying lawsuit against Essex's additional insured, Centereach Realty, is brought by an employee of Grandview to recover for personal injuries allegedly sustained in the course of his employment, Essex is not obligated to provide a defense and/or indemnification to Centereach.

Nor did Essex fail to provide a timely disclaimer to Centereach in accordance with the requirement of Insurance Law § 3420(d). Although the initial tender of coverage to Grandview was not directly addressed to Essex, Essex responded within seven days after it received the letter, advising that the policy did not provide coverage. Centereach received a copy of the disclaimer letter, which contained language specifically indicating that it would not be provided coverage.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CENTEREACH REALTY v. ESSEX INS. CO
(Jun 3, 2003)