The finding of sex discrimination based on pregnancy (see Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 78 N.Y.2d 207, 210,on remand 181 A.D.2d 891, amended 185 A.D.2d 889, lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 762) is supported by substantial evidence showing, inter alia, that the complainant's request for a leave of absence due to complications from a miscarriage was denied by petitioner even though supported by a doctor's note, that the complainant's male counterparts were treated more favorably in being allowed to take leave without adequate time accruals or being paid for days out sick, and that the claimant was prevented from filing a timely disability claim by petitioner's failure to return a form to her. No basis exists to disturb respondent's findings of credibility rejecting the testimony of petitioner's principals that the complainant was terminated for insubordination in taking time without permission, and that they were unaware of her miscarriage, ensuing medical problems and doctor's note until after the termination was implemented (see Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436). We have considered and rejected petitioner's other arguments.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.