The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony and physical evidence as fruits of an allegedly unlawful arrest. Defendant was pursued and captured by a civilian with the aid of a group of police officers and police academy recruits. To the extent that this assistance constituted a police seizure of defendant, it was a brief investigatory detention requiring only reasonable suspicion (see People v. Allen, 73 N.Y.2d 378; People v. Hicks, 68 N.Y.2d 234). Although the People's sole witness at the suppression hearing was the arresting officer, who arrived while defendant was already being detained, the totality of this officer's testimony as to what he saw and heard at the scene warranted the inference that the other police personnel possessed the requisite reasonable suspicion (see People v. Gonzalez, 91 N.Y.2d 909; People v. Mims, 88 N.Y.2d 99, 113-114). The victim immediately arrived and identified defendant, creating probable cause for defendant's arrest.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.