Defendant's claim that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial is unpreserved (see People v. Jordan, 62 N.Y.2d 825; see also People v. Rowe, 244 A.D.2d 295, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 930), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Furthermore, defendant has not provided the minutes of all the adjournments that are relevant to this claim (see People v. Olivo, 52 N.Y.2d 309, 320). Were we to review this claim, we would find no constitutional violation (see People v. Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442). Substantial portions of the delay were caused by defendant's extensive motion practice and his failure to appear in court, necessitating the issuance of a bench warrant, and there was no showing of prejudice.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.