AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL L. CHRISPEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the third degree (Penal Law 130.25) and sodomy in the third degree (130.40 [2]). The waiver by defendant of the right to appeal was knowing and voluntary and encompasses his challenges to the factual sufficiency of the plea ( see People v. Harris, 269 A.D.2d 839; People v. DeJesus, 248 A.D.2d 1023, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 878) and the severity of the sentence ( see People v. Lococo, 92 N.Y.2d 825, 827; Harris, 269 A.D.2d at 839). While defendant's contention that the plea was not knowing and voluntary survives the waiver of the right to appeal, by failing to move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment, defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review ( see Harris, 269 A.D.2d at 839-840). "This is not one of those rare cases in which the statements of defendant engender significant doubt with respect to his guilt or otherwise call into question the voluntariness of the plea" ( id. at 840).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CHRISPEN
(Jun 13, 2003)