MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
County Court properly denied defendant's motion seeking to suppress the showup identification by the victim. We reject the contention of defendant that, because the police had probable cause to arrest him on other charges and were not going to release him, the showup was unnecessary and thus impermissible. We conclude that, because the showup was "conducted in close geographic and temporal proximity to the crime," it was permissible even in the absence of exigent circumstances ( People v Brisco, 99 N.Y.2d 596, 597). Contrary to the further contention of defendant, "[t]he circumstances that defendant was handcuffed behind his back and in the presence of police officers, and that the complainant was told that [she] would be viewing a suspect, did not render the procedure unduly suggestive" ( People v. Edwards, 259 A.D.2d 343, 344, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 969; see People v. Smith, 289 A.D.2d 1056, 1057, lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 641). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.