AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. ROMULUS LUTCHMANSIGH, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was convicted of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree. The trial court properly ruled that if the defendant testified that the victim's injuries were accidental, the People would have been permitted to cross-examine him regarding his prior conviction of attempted rape in the first degree of the victim. Evidence of this prior criminal conduct against the victim would have been admissible to establish intent, the absence of mistake, and the nature of his relationship with the victim ( see People v. Molineux, 168 N.Y. 264; People v. Howard, 285 A.D.2d 560; People v. Underwood, 255 A.D.2d 405, 406; People v. Shorey, 172 A.D.2d 634).

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, do not warrant reversal.

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN and RIVERA, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. LUTCHMANSIGH
(Jun 30, 2003)