Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

MUMFORD AND MILLER CONCRETE, INC. and ST. PAUL COMPANIES f/k/a UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, Defendants Below, Appellants, v. STRUCTA-BOND, INC., Plaintiff Below, Appellee.

This 2nd day of July 2003, the Court, having carefully considered the decision and judgment of the Superior Court dated September 17, 2002, together with the briefs of the parties, has determined that to the extent that (a) the issues raised on appeal are factual, the record evidence supports the factual findings; (b) the errors alleged on appeal are asserted to be an abuse of discretion, the record does not support those assertions; and (c) the issues raised on appeal are legal, they are controlled by settled Delaware law, which was properly applied.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED on the basis of, and for the reasons set forth, in its decision dated September 17, 2002.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MUMFORD AND MILLER CONCRETE v. STRUCTA-BOND
(Jul 2, 2003)