AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF JUDITH D. (ANONYMOUS). SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, respondent; PATRICIA D. (ANONYMOUS), appellant. (PROCEEDING NO. 1) IN THE MATTER OF JILLIAN D. (ANONYMOUS). SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, respondent; PATRICIA D. (ANONYMOUS), appellant. (PROCEEDING NO. 2)

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the notice of appeal from a decision entered July 26, 2001, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the order entered August 9, 2001 ( see CPLR 5520[c]); and it is further,

ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court may revoke a suspended judgment after a violation hearing upon a finding supported by a preponderance of the evidence that the parent failed to comply with one or more of its conditions ( see Matter of Francisco Anthony C.F., 305 A.D.2d 410 [2d Dept, May 5, 2003]; Matter of Alka H., 278 A.D.2d 326). The evidence presented at the violation hearing supports the Family Court's determination that the mother failed to satisfy certain conditions of the suspended judgment, and that the termination of her parental rights was in the best interests of the children ( see Matter of Ishia Marie W., 292 A.D.2d 535, 536; Matter of Kenneth A., 206 A.D.2d 602).

SANTUCCI, J.P., McGINITY, TOWNES and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF JUDITH D
(Jul 21, 2003)