AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

MELLICENT DAVIS, respondent, v. JOSE MALDONADO, ETC., ET AL., appellants, ET AL., defendants.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff's motion to restore the action. A case dismissed pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.27 may be restored only if the plaintiff demonstrates both a reasonable excuse for the default in failing to appear at the conference and a meritorious cause of action ( see Syed v. Fedor, 296 A.D.2d 399). Since the plaintiff demonstrated both, the motion was properly granted.

RITTER, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, McGINITY, TOWNES and COZIER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DAVIS v. MALDONADO
(Aug 11, 2003)