GERLING GLOBAL INS. CORP. OF AMERICA v. LOW

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Nos. 01-17023, 01-17433, 02-15282.

Attorney(S)

George L. O'Connell, Timothy R. Grieve, Stevens and O'Connell, Sacramento, CA, James P. Donovan, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman and Dicker, Frederick W. Reif, Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland and Perretti, LLP, New York, NY, Kenneth S. Geller, Mayer, Brown, Rowe Maw, LLP, Washington, DC, Michael W. McConnell, Stephen M. Shapiro, Mayer, Brown, Rowe Maw, LLP, Chicago, IL, Neil M. Soltman, John Nadolenco, Mayer, Brown, Rowe Maw LLP, Sally Agel, Chandra L. Gooding, Linda Dakin-Grimm, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley McCloy, Los Angeles, CA, Peter Simshauser, Lance A. Etcheverry, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher and Flom LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Kenneth C. Mennemeir, Andrew W. Stroud, Mennemeir, Glassman Stroud LLP, Sacramento, CA, Leslie Tick, San Francisco, CA, Frank Kaplan, Jesse J. Contreras, Ryan S. Hedges, Alschuler, Grossman, Stein Kahan LLP, Santa Monica, CA, for Defendant-Appellant. Daniel L. Siegel, Sacramento, CA, Lee H. Roussel, Olympia, WA, David A. Lash, Los Angeles, CA, for Amicus.

Judges

Alfred Theodore Goodwin
Susan Graber
Richard A. Paez

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

GERLING GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORP. OF AMERICA; Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. — U.S. Branch; Gerling Global Life Reinsurance Company; Gerling Global Life Insurance Company; Gerling America Insurance Company; and Constitution Insurance Corp., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants-Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Harry W. LOW, in his capacity as the Commissioner of Insurance of the State of California, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee-Defendant-Appellee. Assicurazioni Generali, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant-Plaintiff-Appellant,

ORDER

The Supreme Court of the United States has reversed our decision in Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Low, 296 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 2002), and remanded the case for further consideration in light of American Insurance Ass'n v. Garamendi, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S.Ct. 2374, 156 L.Ed.2d 376 (2003). See Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Garamendi, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S.Ct. 2638, 156 L.Ed.2d 652 (2003). We, in turn, remand this matter to the district court for such further proceedings as may be appropriate in light of the Supreme Court's opinion. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Comments