AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF FRANCES SIEMS, petitioner-respondent, v. JUSTIN N. LITE, ET AL., appellants, ET AL., respondents.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the final order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings consistent herewith, to be held with all due speed.

The Supreme Court erred in granting that branch of the petition which was to invalidate the designating petitions on the grounds of noncompliance with the rules of the New York State Board of Elections and the Suffolk County Board of Elections regarding the utilization of petition volume identification numbers ( see 9 NYCRR 6215.3[f]). There is no justification for invalidating the designating petitions under those rules, which are to be liberally construed ( see 9 NYCRR 6215.6[a]), where there has been substantial compliance and there is no evidence of confusion either by potential voters or the Board of Elections ( see Matter of Most v. Walker, 297 A.D.2d 356). Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a determination of the cross motion to dismiss, and, if necessary, a hearing with respect to the remaining issues raised in the pleadings.

SANTUCCI, J.P., FLORIO, FRIEDMANN, CRANE and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF SIEMS v. LITE
(Aug 20, 2003)