Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates

LINDA ANDERSON NEWTON, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. MICHAEL K. TAYLOR, Defendant/Appellant.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Michael Taylor, appeals the trial court's judgment denying his motion to set aside a default judgment. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo.banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Glenn A. Norton, P.J., Kathianne Knaup Crane, J. and Mary K. Hoff, J. concurring.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NEWTON v. TAYLOR
(Aug 19, 2003)