AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

ST. PAUL GUARDIAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. CENTRUM G.S. LIMITED, et al, Defendants.

JUDGMENT

SAM LINDSAY, District Judge

This judgment is issued pursuant to the opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, dated March 11, 2002, and the court's Order of August 29, 2003. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, DECREED and DECLARED that Plaintiff St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company ("St. Paul") had a duty to defend Defendants Centrum G.S. Limited, Goodyork Corporation, Steiner Associates, Inc., Yaromir Steiner and Brenda Brushaber (collectively, "Defendants") in the underlying state action styled, Gerry Perdue v. Yaromir Steiner, Steiner Associates, Inc. d/b/a the Centrum Property Company, d/b/a Centrum Towers and d/b/a Steiner Management, Inc., Brenda Brushaber, Centrum G.S. Ltd., Goodyork Corporation, and Steiner Management, Inc., Cause No. 95-08507-F, 116th Judicial District Court (the "Perdue Action"); that this duty to defend was triggered as of the date St. Paul received notice of the Perdue Action; that as a result of this duty, Defendants are entitled to recover from St. Paul all reasonable expenses and fees they incurred because of St. Paul's refusal to defend them in the Perdue Action; that all relief requested by St. Paul is denied, that this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice; and that all reasonable and allowable costs are taxed against St. Paul.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ST. PAUL GUARDIAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. CENTRUM G.S. LTD
(Aug 29, 2003)