AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., appellant, v. ANTHONY SILAS, respondent.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, the defendant's motion is denied, the verdict is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for sentencing on the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

A trial court is permitted to set aside a verdict only on a ground which, if raised on appeal, would require reversal as a matter of law (see CPL 330.30; People v. Carter, 63 N.Y.2d 530). Therefore, only a claim of error that is properly preserved for appellate review will provide a basis to set aside the verdict (see People v. Patino, 259 A.D.2d 502; People v. Sadowski, 173 A.D.2d 873) . For the defendant to properly preserve his claim that the jury should have been charged with the defense of temporary and innocent possession of a weapon, he was required to raise the claim at trial (see People v. Kouvaras, 197 A.D.2d 638). The defendant failed to do so and the trial court was, therefore, without authority to set aside the verdict on that ground (see People v. Patino, supra).

In any event, even viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant, there was no reasonable view of the evidence upon which the jury could have found that the defendant had a legal excuse for having the weapon in his possession (see People v. Banks, 76 N.Y.2d 799 ; People v. Kouvaras, supra).

SANTUCCI, J.P., McGINITY, TOWNES and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SILAS
(Sep 8, 2003)