Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BRUCE MICHAEL BUSWELL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

WHATLEY, Judge.

Bruce Michael Buswell correctly contends, and the State correctly concedes, that the trial court erred in denying his motion to correct sentence in which he asserted that the trial court erred in placing him on drug offender probation as a sanction for his conviction of driving while license suspended. See Jones v. State, 813 So.2d 22, 25 (Fla. 2002) ("Section 948.01(13) [providing for drug offender probation] . . . applies only to violations of chapter 893, which defines nonviolent drug crimes."); State v. Lazo, 761 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) ("The plain language of section 948.034(2) [the 1997 provision allowing drug offender probation] unambiguously indicates that it applies only to violations of the specific provisions referenced in the statute. . . . Driving on a suspended or revoked driver's license is not."). Accord Ellis v. State, 816 So.2d 759 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

Accordingly, we affirm Buswell's convictions but we reverse Buswell's sentence for driving while license suspended and remand for resentencing with directions consistent with this opinion.

STRINGER and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BUSWELL v. STATE
(Oct 1, 2003)