The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court's credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761). The officer had, at the very least, a founded suspicion of criminal activity (see People v. DeBour, 40 N.Y.2d 210, 223), based upon his observation of a man giving money to defendant in return for an unidentified item which the man promptly placed into his mouth (see People v. Jones, 90 N.Y.2d 835). The officer was justified in following defendant into a grocery store, asking him to turn around, asking him for identification, asking him to keep his hands where the officer could see them and asking him to step outside the store so that the inquiry could be conducted safely. When defendant refused repeated requests to show his hands, and then reached toward his waistband, the officer reasonably believed that defendant was armed and properly conducted a frisk for weapons (see People v. Batista, 88 N.Y.2d 650, 654); People v. Benjamin, 51 N.Y.2d 267, 271), which led to the lawful recovery of a pistol and drugs.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.