Respondent's neglect of the subject children was established by evidence showing that he stored heroin, which he intended to sell, in the family home and thus failed to exercise "a minimum degree of care" in his assumed role as a parental figure to properly supervise the children and act as their guardian (see Family Court Act § 1012[f]; Matter of Joey T., 185 A.D.2d 851). Evidence at the fact-finding hearing established that respondent had hidden bundles of heroin in the children's hamper; that he packaged narcotics in the presence of one of the children, age nine; that he sold drugs from the family home to strangers; and that his drug-related activities in the home had led to his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. Respondent's conduct, placing the children in near proximity to accessible narcotics and to the very dangerous activity of narcotics trafficking, posed an imminent danger to the children's physical, mental and emotional well-being.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.