AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF DAMAR RODRIQUEZ, appellant, v. SHARON VAN PUTTEN, respondent.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

While the father's incarceration, standing alone, did not render visitation inappropriate ( see Matter of Davis v. Davis, 232 A.D.2d 773; Matter of Mohammed v. Cortland County Dept. of Social Servs., 186 A.D.2d 908), the Family Court properly determined that, under all of the circumstances, visitation would not be in the child's best interest ( see Matter of Marcial v. Sullivan, 296 A.D.2d 551; Matter of Williams v. Tillman, 289 A.D.2d 885; Matter of Davis v. Davis, 265 A.D.2d 552).

The father's remaining contentions are without merit.

RITTER, J.P., FLORIO, S. MILLER and LUCIANO, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF RODRIQUEZ v. VAN PUTTEN
(Oct 14, 2003)