Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PAUL K. GUNDOTRA, Appellant, v. RITA GUNDOTRA, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, but remanded to correct a mathematical error in the judgment conceded by appellee. Appellant should be entitled to retain his property awarded to the wife by paying a total of $82,200.00.

GUNTHER, WARNER and MAY, JJ., concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL DISPOSITION OF ANY TIMELY FILED MOTION FOR REHEARING.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GUNDOTRA v. GUNDOTRA
(Oct 15, 2003)