AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. MAXIMO ARROYO, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

By failing to make specific objections, the defendant failed to preserve his present contentions regarding the prosecutor's opening statement and summation ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245), and we decline to review them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

The defendant's remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., KRAUSMAN, TOWNES and COZIER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ARROYO
(Oct 20, 2003)