DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff was injured when she was struck by a six-pack of beer which fell from a shelf in a supermarket operated by the defendant Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Company, Inc. (hereinafter A P), as she attempted to remove another six-pack from the shelf. She subsequently commenced this action against, among others, A P, contending that the six-packs of beer were improperly stacked on a high shelf.
The Supreme Court properly granted A P's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, A P established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition to the motion, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. There is no evidence that a dangerous condition existed ( see Crawford v. Pick Quick Foods, 300 A.D.2d 431, 432; Hofmann v. Toys "R" Us — N.Y. Ltd. Partnership, 272 A.D.2d 296). Even if such a condition existed, there is no evidence that A P created or had actual or constructive notice of such condition ( see Ruggiero v. Waldbaums Supermarkets, 242 A.D.2d 268).
ALTMAN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, ADAMS and MASTRO, JJ., concur.