The record evidence before us in this rear-end collision case raises triable, material issues of fact as to liability. It includes testimony that immediately prior to the collision, defendants' vehicle was negligently operated, which substantially contributed to causing the accident. The papers in opposition to the motion assert that defendant passed plaintiff's vehicle, then switched lanes, leaving only an eight-foot interval between the vehicles, and almost immediately came to a sudden stop ( see Singh v. Sanders, 286 A.D.2d 256; Malekan v. City Harvest, Inc., 234 A.D.2d 94; see also Burns v. Gonzalez, 307 A.D.2d 863, 763 N.Y.S.2d 603).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.