AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

STEPHEN TANCREDI, et ano., Plaintiffs, -against- METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et ano., Defendants

ORDER

LEWIS KAPLAN, District Judge

Following this Court's determination that defendants were entitled to recover attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Francis for a determination of the amount. In a report and recommendation dated October 7, 2003, Judge Francis recommended an award of $30,000 against plaintiffs, jointly and severally. Plaintiffs object, raising a host of jurisdictional and procedural points, many of which this Court rejected previously. Defendants have not objected.

The Court again has reviewed plaintiffs' plethora of jurisdictional and procedural objections and found them to be without merit. Indeed, while the Court is not inviting yet another round of sanctions litigation, it is clear that at least the bulk of these objections verge on the irresponsible. The objections all are overruled.

In view of the lack of any objection by the defendants to the recommended amount of the award, the Court declines to examine that issue.

Defendants' motion for an award of attorneys' fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 is granted to the extent that they shall have judgment against plaintiffs, jointly and severally, in the amount of $30,000. Upon entry of judgment, the Clerk shall close the case.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TANCREDI v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
(Nov 3, 2003)