AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HECTOR CONTRERA, Plaintiff-appellant, v. GESHER REALTY CORP., Defendant-Respondent.

Plaintiff, a welder, alleges that he was injured when, replacing a permanent outside wooden staircase at defendant's residence with one made of iron, the rotted step he was standing on gave way, causing him to fall through. Plaintiff has no cause of action under Labor Law § 240(1) because the work did not involve risks related to elevation differentials requiring the furnishing or erection of such a device (Carrion v. Lewmara Realty Corp., 222 A.D.2d 205, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 896;compare Foufana v. City of New York, 211 A.D.2d 550, 551). The Industrial Code sections that plaintiff invokes to support his cause of action under Labor Law § 241(6) ( 12 NYCRR 23-1.25[d] [welders to be provided with scaffolding where necessary]; 12 NYCRR 23-1.7[b][1] [hazardous openings into which a person may step or fall to be guarded by cover or safety railing]) do not apply to the facts herein, and the causes for common-law negligence and under Labor Law § 200 lack merit because an owner of real property has no responsibility to one hurt through a dangerous condition he has undertaken to fix (see Carrion, 222 A.D.2d at 206).

We have considered plaintiff's other arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CONTRERA v. GESHER REALTY CORP
(Nov 6, 2003)