DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs payable by the objectants personally, the renewed motion is granted, the objections are dismissed, and the will is admitted to probate.
"Where, as here, the attorney-draftsman supervised the will's execution, there is a presumption of regularity that the will was properly executed in all respects" ( Matter of Finocchio, 270 A.D.2d 418; see Matter of Ziele, 242 A.D.2d 576). Here, the petitioner met her prima facie burden in establishing that the will was properly executed in accordance with the formal requirements of EPTL 3-2.1.
Further, the objectants failed to raise a triable issue of fact since they failed to present any evidence to support their claims of lack of proper execution, lack of testamentary capacity, undue influence, and fraud ( see Matter of Walther, 6 N.Y.2d 49; Matter of Rosen, 291 A.D.2d 562; Matter of Evanchuk, 145 A.D.2d 559). As such, the Surrogate's Court should have granted the renewed motion, dismissed the objections, and admitted the will to probate ( see Matter of Herman, 289 A.D.2d 239).
The petitioner's remaining contention is without merit.
SANTUCCI, J.P., LUCIANO, SCHMIDT and COZIER, JJ., concur.