AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROBERT OLTZ, Defendant-Appellant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of seven counts of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 165.45) and one count of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree (§ 165.40) in satisfaction of a 39-count indictment. By failing to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the plea allocution is factually insufficient ( see People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665; People v. Tapscott, 302 A.D.2d 918, 919). The rare case exception to the preservation requirement does not apply where, as here, nothing in "defendant's recitation of the facts underlying the crime pleaded to clearly casts significant doubt upon the defendant's guilt or otherwise calls into question the voluntariness of the plea" ( Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d at 666; see Tapscott, 302 A.D.2d at 919).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. OLTZ
(Nov 21, 2003)