AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MATTER OF LARRY DAHN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CORNELIUS KEANE, AS COMMISSIONER OF FIRE FOR CITY OF BUFFALO, AND CITY OF BUFFALO, Respondents-Respondents.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking a judgment directing respondent City of Buffalo (City) to pay him supplemental wages and benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-a (2) or, alternatively, to conduct a hearing on his eligibility for such benefits. In their answer, respondents asserted the statute of limitations as an affirmative defense. Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition as timebarred. The New York State Police and Fire Retirement System granted petitioner a performance of duty disability retirement and, by letter dated June 12, 2001, the City informed petitioner that he was not eligible for supplemental wages and benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-a (2). On September 4, 2001, petitioner served a demand for such wages and benefits upon the City or, alternatively, for a hearing to determine his eligibility for those wages and benefits. Petitioner thereafter commenced this proceeding on December 24, 2001. Contrary to petitioner's contention, this proceeding is in the nature of mandamus to review, not mandamus to compel the performance of a statutory duty ( see Matter of Dearman v. City of White Plains, 237 A.D.2d 603), and the statute of limitations thus began to run on June 12, 2001, the date on which the City's determination became final and binding on petitioner ( see CPLR 217; Matter of De Milio v. Borghard, 55 N.Y.2d 216, 220; Matter of Gruosso v. County of Nassau, 264 A.D.2d 396). The City's determination was "formal, explicit, and unequivocal" and was thus final on that date ( Nickerson v. City of Jamestown, 178 A.D.2d 1003, 1003). Petitioner's subsequent demand for supplemental wages and benefits or for a hearing was at most a request for reconsideration of the City's determination and did not toll or revive the statute of limitations ( see Matter of Lubin v. Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 N.Y.2d 974, 976, rearg denied 61 N.Y.2d 905, 62 N.Y.2d 803, cert denied 469 U.S. 823).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF DAHN v. KEANE
(Nov 21, 2003)