DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The jury verdict finding that the defendant driver was negligent but that his negligence was not a proximate cause of the accident was not against the weight of the evidence ( see Campbell v. Crimi, 267 A.D.2d 343; Rubin v. Pecoraro, 141 A.D.2d 525) . "A jury's finding that a party was at fault but that that fault was not a proximate cause of the accident is inconsistent and against the weight of the evidence only when the issues are `so inextricably interwoven as to make it logically impossible to find negligence without also finding proximate cause'" ( Schaefer v. Guddemi, 182 A.D.2d 808, 809, quoting Rubin v. Pecoraro, 141 A.D.2d 525, 527). In this case, the issues were not so inextricably interwoven such that the jury's finding was against the weight of the evidence.
SANTUCCI, J.P., McGINITY, SCHMIDT and ADAMS, JJ., concur.