DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.
This action was marked off the trial calendar in May 2001 and automatically dismissed in May 2002 pursuant to CPLR 3404. The plaintiffs did not move to restore the action until November 2002. Under these circumstances, the plaintiffs were required to establish a meritorious cause of action, a reasonable excuse for the delay in prosecution of the action, a lack of intent to abandon the action, and a lack of prejudice to the defendants ( see Fernandez v. Staten Is. Oral Maxillofacial Surgery Assocs., 289 A.D.2d 372; Basetti v. Nour, 287 A.D.2d 126, 131). The plaintiffs failed to make the requisite showing. Accordingly, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs' motion.
RITTER, J.P., SMITH, FRIEDMANN, H. MILLER and CRANE, JJ., concur.