AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM P. KALTEUX, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MUGGLIN, J.

Defendant entered this plea in full satisfaction of a six-count indictment arising out of a violent domestic dispute in the City of Watervliet, Albany County, during which he repeatedly punched, kicked and stabbed his wife. Pursuant to the plea bargain agreement, defendant was to be sentenced to 2… to 5 years in prison, but he failed to appear for sentencing. Following a two-year hiatus, defendant was sentenced to 7… to 15 years in prison, and he now appeals.

First, defendant complains that his plea of guilty was not voluntary since he lacked a complete understanding of his legal rights or the consequences of the plea. Defendant's failure to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction leaves this issue unpreserved for appellate review (see People v. Thomas, 307 A.D.2d 592, 592;People v. De Berardinis, 304 A.D.2d 914, 915; People v. Barnes, 302 A.D.2d 623, 623, lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 652; People v. Nieves, 302 A.D.2d 625, 625, lv denied 100 N.Y.2d 541). In any event, the record reveals the complete lack of any factual basis which would support this argument.

Next, we find no merit to defendant's present claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because he was not properly apprised of his legal rights or potential defenses to the indictment. Again, we find no record evidence to support such a claim. Defendant's attorney made significant and detailed pretrial motions, competently participated in all pretrial hearings, and successfully obtained an advantageous plea agreement for defendant. Additionally, defendant affirmatively acknowledged to County Court that he was satisfied with the services rendered by his attorney. The totality of the circumstances clearly reveals that defendant received the meaningful assistance of counsel within constitutional requirements (see People v. Rivera, 71 N.Y.2d 705, 708). Finally, mere assertions that counsel did not explore all possible defenses does not rise to the level of ineffective assistance of counsel (see People v. Smith, 302 A.D.2d 677, 680, lv denied 100 N.Y.2d 543).

As a final matter, defendant's attack on the sentence imposed is precluded by his voluntary waiver of appeal (see People v. Stauber, 307 A.D.2d 544, 545; People v. Schryver, 306 A.D.2d 626, 626-627, [2003]; People v. Ackerly, 297 A.D.2d 861, 862, lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 554).

Mercure, J.P., Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. KALTEUX
(Dec 11, 2003)