CREW III, J.P.
Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of attempted sodomy in the third degree in satisfaction of a two-count indictment. Prior to sentencing, County Court conducted a hearing pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C) (hereinafter SORA) for a determination of defendant's risk assessment as a sex offender. County Court classified defendant as a risk level III sex offender and thereafter sentenced defendant to time served and three years' probation in accordance with the plea agreement (see Correction Law § 168-n). Defendant now appeals.
Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and defendant's pro se letter, wherein he contends that he was "mentally disordered" on the day of the plea and not otherwise fully informed by his attorneys of the effect of SORA's requirements, we agree. To the extent that defendant argues that his plea was not knowing or voluntary, this claim is not preserved for our review because defendant failed to move to withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v. Miller, 306 A.D.2d 752, 753; People v. De Berardinis, 304 A.D.2d 914, 915, lv denied 100 N.Y.2d 580). In any event, we find that the record clearly reveals that defendant's plea, which included a waiver of his right to appeal, was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made. Notably, County Court clearly explained to defendant the consequences of defendant's plea and adequately ascertained that he fully understood the implications of SORA, had discussed his plea and SORA with counsel and had no questions regarding any of the conditions that County Court imposed. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of conviction and grant defense counsel's application for leave to withdraw (see People v. Cruwys, 113 A.D.2d 979, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 650; see generally People v. Stokes, 95 N.Y.2d 633).
Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be
relieved of assignment granted.