DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. The complaint was unintelligible, and lacked specificity and any legally cognizable claim ( see Kung v. Pan, 285 A.D.2d 532).
RITTER, J.P., SMITH, FRIEDMANN, H. MILLER and CRANE, JJ., concur.