DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The defendant failed to move for a change of venue within 15 days after service of her demand Therefore, the motion was properly denied ( see CPLR 511[b]; Runcie v. Cross County Shopping Mall, 268 A.D.2d 577). The defendant's claim that she was misled as to the plaintiff's actual residence is not supported by the record. Accordingly, there exists no basis for her contention that her noncompliance with the time limit should be overlooked since she moved promptly after discovering the plaintiff's true residence.
RITTER, J.P., SMITH, FRIEDMANN, H. MILLER and CRANE, JJ., concur.