DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion to vacate his plea of guilty. The defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily pleaded guilty, and his conclusory claims regarding ineffective assistance of counsel and dissatisfaction with the promised sentence were insufficient to warrant withdrawal of his plea ( see People v. Curras, A.D.2d [2d Dept, Nov. 10, 2003]; People v. Carter, 304 A.D.2d 771; People v. Telfair, 299 A.D.2d 429).
The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court improperly adjudicated him a persistent violent felony offender is unpreserved for appellate review, as he failed to object to the predicate felony statement or the constitutionality of his prior convictions ( see People v. Rosen, 96 N.Y.2d 329, 335, cert denied 534 U.S. 899; People v. Rice, 285 A.D.2d 617). In any event, his contention is without merit.
The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816).
FLORIO, J.P., KRAUSMAN, LUCIANO, TOWNES and RIVERA, JJ., concur.