DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the appeal from the order dated January 7, 2003, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated April 8, 2003, made upon reargument; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order dated April 8, 2003, is affirmed; and it is further,
ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent.
In order to successfully oppose a motion for leave to enter a default judgment based upon the failure to timely serve an answer, a defendant must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for its delay and the existence of a meritorious defense ( see Gurreri v. Village of Briarcliff Manor, 249 A.D.2d 508). The defendants in this case failed to satisfy either requirement. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the respondent's motion for leave to enter a default judgment.
We further find that, upon reargument, the defendants improperly raised a new issue ( see Foley v. Roche, 68 A.D.2d 558, 568). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly adhered to its original determination.
SANTUCCI, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, SCHMIDT and COZIER, JJ., concur.