Supreme Court properly interpreted the condominium bylaws to restrict the sponsor to the election of no more than two directors "by reason of" its vote of unsold shares. The restriction is clearly applicable, and plaintiffs have not identified any contrary bylaw or conflicting regulation ( see Matter of Visutton Assoc. v. Anita Terrace Owners, 254 A.D.2d 295, 296, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 803; Matter of Flagg Ct. Realty Co. v. Flagg Ct. Owners Corp., 230 A.D.2d 740; cf. Rego Park Gardens Assoc. v. Rego Park Gardens Owners, 174 A.D.2d 337, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 859). The bylaws do not prohibit the sponsor from casting all its votes, but merely bar the sponsor from obtaining control of the board under certain circumstances ( see Matter of Visutton, at 296).
We have considered the parties' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.