DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's claim that the court should have adjudicated him a youthful offender is unpreserved for appellate review since he failed to object or move to withdraw his plea on this ground ( see People v. Noboa, 280 A.D.2d 558; People v. Brown, 265 A.D.2d 486; People v. Berry, 233 A.D.2d 336).
In any event, the determination to deny youthful offender treatment to the defendant was a provident exercise of discretion ( see People v. Taylor, 302 A.D.2d 480; People v. Wallace, 246 A.D.2d 676).
SANTUCCI, J.P., KRAUSMAN, SCHMIDT and RIVERA, JJ., concur.