AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

IN THE MATTER OF HOWARD LONDON, ET AL., respondents, v. ARTHUR BLAZER, appellant. (Proceeding No. 1) IN THE MATTER OF HOWARD LONDON, ET AL., respondents,

DECISION ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the respondent, inter alia, to dismiss appeals from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, both dated September 18, 2002, on the ground that the appeals have been rendered academic. By decision and order on motion of this court dated May 28, 2003, that branch of the motion which was to dismiss the appeals was held in abeyance and referred to the Justices hearing the appeals, for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the argument of the appeals, it is

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeals is dismissed as academic ( see Matter of London v. Blazer, A.D.2d [decided herewith]).

RITTER, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, McGINITY and CRANE, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN MATTER OF LONDON v. BLAZER, 2002-09649 [2d Dept 2003
(Dec 29, 2003)