AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CITY OF ROCHESTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. STEPHEN I. TEREMY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant, the owner of vacant residential property in the City of Rochester, appeals from an order of County Court affirming a judgment of City Court that found him in violation of Rochester City Code § 90-21(B)(6) for failing to cut grass and weeds in the rear yard of his property, and imposed a penalty of $150. A Rochester Neighborhood Conservation Officer responding to the complaint of a neighbor discovered the violation when the officer inspected the rear yard from the driveway. We reject the contention of defendant that the officer's warrantless entry onto the property violated the constitutional protections against unreasonable searches (see US Const Fourth Amend; N.Y. Const, art I, § 12). Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy with respect to observations of the rear yard from the driveway ( see People v. Versaggi, 296 A.D.2d 429, lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 714; People v. Warmuth, 187 A.D.2d 473, 474-475, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 894; People v. Lewis, 162 A.D.2d 760, 762-763, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 894; People v. Smith, 109 A.D.2d 1096, 1098-1099).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CITY OF ROCHESTER v. TEREMY
(Dec 31, 2003)