AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In re: PICUS, INC. PICUS COMMUNICATIONS, L.L.C. SYBERCOM, INC. iPLUS INTERNET SERVICES, INC. INTERNET ENTERPRISE CENTER, INC., Chapter 11, Debtors-in-Possession

ORDER APPROVING FINAL APPLICATION OF COUNSEL FOR THE OFFICIAL UNSECURED CREDITORS COMMITTEE FOR ALLOWANCE OF COMPENSATION

STEPHEN ST. JOHN, Bankruptcy Judge

Troutman Sanders LLP ("T S"), counsel for the Official Unsecured Creditors Committee of Picus, Inc., et al, filed its Final Application of Counsel for the Official Unsecured Creditors Committee for Allowance of Compensation (the "Application") requesting final approval of all fees and expenses payable to T S during the case, including fees of $1,525.00 and $0.00 in expenses, for a total award of $1,525.00 for the period December 1, 2002 through date of hearing on this Application.

Notice of the filing of the Application and the time and place of a hearing thereon was given by mail to all creditors and parties in interest. A hearing on the Application was convened on Thursday, December 11, 2002, at 11:00 a.m. in the United States Bankruptcy Court, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia.

No objection to the Application was filed and no party appeared in opposition to the relief requested in the Application. Accordingly, it is

ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that the services rendered and costs incurred or advanced by T S were actual, reasonable and necessary costs and expenses and T S is allowed final compensation for fees of $1,525.00 and $0.00 costs, for a total award of $1,525.00 for the period December 1, 2002 through date of hearing on this Application. In addition, the Court approves, as final, all other compensation awarded T S during the case, which fees and costs were actual, reasonable and necessary post-petition costs and expenses.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE PICUS, INC. (Bankr.E.D.Va. 2004)
(Jan 5, 2004)