AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GARY E. BRICKEY, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Mercure, J.

Defendant was charged in a 10-count indictment with various crimes arising from incidents occurring between September 2001 and December 2001 during which he had sexual contact with his minor step-granddaughter. He subsequently entered an Alford plea to the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree in full satisfaction of the indictment. Under the terms of the plea agreement, defendant waived his right to appeal, except with respect to the sentence, and was to be sentenced to a prison term of "up to seven years." At sentencing, County Court imposed a seven-year prison term, to be followed by a three-year period of postrelease supervision, as well as a $5,000 fine and an order of protection.

On appeal, defendant contends that the sentence and fine are harsh and excessive. Initially, we note that County Court imposed the statutorily authorized maximum sentence, which defendant was informed that the prosecution would recommend as part of the plea bargain (see Penal Law § 70.02 [c]). Given the heinous nature of the crime involving defendant's abuse of a position of trust, as well as his extensive criminal history which includes prior sex crimes, we find no abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v. Agan, 301 A.D.2d 968, 968; People v. Shook, 294 A.D.2d 710, 713-714, lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 702). Moreover, County Court had authority to impose the fine (see Penal Law § 80.00 [a]) and, considering the nature of defendant's conduct and that he was informed of this potential consequence during the plea proceedings, we find no reason to disturb it (see People v. Oliver, 276 A.D.2d 930, 931).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BRICKEY
(Jan 8, 2004)