AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

ANNA J. CAULEY, Plaintiff, v. INGRAM MICRO, INC., Defendant

DECISION AND ORDER

WILLIAM SKRETNY, District Judge

1. This Court the above-captioned to the Honorable Leslie G. Foschio, United States Magistrate Judge, for all pre-trial matters, including the hearing of non-dispositive motions, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(A).

2. On October 24, 2003, Judge Foschio a Report and Recommendation recommending that Defendant Ingram Micro's Cross-Motion for Sanctions be granted and that Plaintiff Anna J. Cauley's Complaint be dismissed. In the alternative, Judge Foschio recommended that Defendant's Cross-Motion to Compel Discovery be granted.

3. Plaintiff filed Objections to Judge Foschio's Report and Recommendation on December 22, 2003.

4. This Court has carefully reviewed de novo Judge Foschio's Report and Recommendation. In addition, this Court has given due consideration to Plaintiff's Objections thereto.

IT HEREBY IS ORDERED that this Court accepts Judge Foschio's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 89), including the authorities cited and the reasons given therein, with respect to the Recommendation that Defendant's Cross-Motion for Sanctions be granted.

FURTHER, that Plaintiffs Objections to Judge Foschio's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 91) are DENIED.

FURTHER, that Defendant's Cross-Motion for Sanctions (Docket No. 83) is GRANTED.

FURTHER, that Defendant's Cross-Motion to Compel Discovery (Docket No. 83) is DENIED as moot.

FURTHER, that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED.

FURTHER, that the Clerk of the Court shall take the to CLOSE this case.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CAULEY v. INGRAM MICRO, INC. (W.D.N.Y. 2004)
(Jan 6, 2004)