AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

IN THE MATTER OF FIRST CENTRAL INSURANCE COMPANY, respondent; and AURELLO MALAVE, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Aurello Malave, the claimant, challenges a notice of disclaimer of coverage sent by First Central Insurance Company (hereinafter FCIC) to, among others, its insured with a copy to him, who was the injured party, in accordance with Insurance Law § 3420(d). FCIC first received notice of the accident approximately 4 1/2 years after the alleged injury occurred, and approximately two years after the claimant commenced a personal injury action against the insured, in which the insured was declared in default. The notice of accident, sent by the insured's broker, was late as a matter of law ( see Deso v. London Lancashire Ins. Co. of America, 3 N.Y.2d 127, 130; Matter of DeLeon v. Motor Vehicle Acc. Indem. Corp., 243 A.D.2d 475, 476; Mount Vernon Fire Ins. Co. v. Timm, 237 A.D.2d 586, 587; Town Bd. of Town of Poughkeepsie v. Continental Ins. Co., 213 A.D.2d 475, 477; Platsky v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 181 A.D.2d 764, 765).

Contrary to the claimant's assertions, the notice the claimant provided to the insured's insurance broker was not notice to the insurer ( see Security Mut. Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp., 31 N.Y.2d 436, 442 n 3; Serravillo v. Sterling Ins. Co., 261 A.D.2d 384, 385; Incorporated Vil. of Pleasantville v. Calvert Ins. Co., 204 A.D.2d 689). The claimant did not exercise his right pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420(a)(3) to provide independent notification to FCIC. Consequently, the disclaimer letter, which stated untimely notice by the insured as the ground for disclaimer, without any reference to untimely notice by the claimant, was proper ( see Travelers Indem. Co. v. Worthy, 281 A.D.2d 411, 412; Mount Vernon Fire Ins. Co. v. Harris, 193 F. Supp.2d 674, 680).

The claimant's remaining contentions are without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., SCHMIDT, ADAMS and CRANE, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF FIRST CENT. INS. CO. v. MALAVE
(Jan 12, 2004)