Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number Nos. 03-03-00328-CR, 03-03-00329-CR Judges David Puryear See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. ROBERT DICKINSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. MEMORANDUM OPINION DAVID PURYEAR, Justice. A jury found appellant Robert Dickinson guilty of aggravated robbery and possession of a prohibited weapon. Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 29.03 (West 2003), § 46.05 (West Supp. 2004). For these offenses, the jury assessed prison terms of twenty-five and five years, respectively. Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the records demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and he was advised of his right to examine the appellate records and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. We have reviewed the records and counsel's brief and agree that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the records that might arguably support the appeals. The judgments of conviction are affirmed.